Trump’s alarming environmental rollback

Sep - 13
2017
environmental rollback

Trump’s alarming environmental rollback

Trump’s alarming environmental rollback: what’s been scrapped so far

Environmental rollback: Donald Trump’s decision to withdraw the United States from the Paris climate accord may have followed months of distressing division among its closest advisers, but its administration has carried out a silent efficiency in dismantling Other major environmental policies.

The White House, Congress and the Environmental Protection Agency have deepened to bring about a dramatic reversal of air and water regulations, implemented by the Barack Obama administration.

Unlike the travel ban or health care, Trump faced some obstacles to sweep away what he called the “assassination” environmental rules that deal with issues such as climate change, pollution Water and misty air.

“I was very concerned about what I saw, it’s about people’s health,” said Christine Todd Whitman, a Republican who was an EPA administrator under George W. Bush and who also Was Governor of New Jersey. “They undermine science and respect people for science. They do not seem to care.”

Trump’s agenda was launched with enthusiasm by Scott Pruitt, the EPA administrator, who promised in February that he would cut the regulations “in a very aggressive manner”. Pruitt has repeatedly characterized the economic cost of green constraints, especially on the coal industry, which he said was the target of a “war” of the Obama administration.

Pruitt, who previously prosecuted the EPA more than a dozen times as Attorney General of Oklahoma, has had exceptionally close ties to the fossil fuel industry, helped remove or postpone a series of regulations And dismissed the EPA from work on climate change.

As each new administration examines or even reorganizes hereditary regulations – especially those adopted on the days of the death of a previous presidency – the scale of the current recovery is unprecedented, according to Whitman.

“We looked at 60 or 70 rules and we kept them all, while this administration seems to think that everything that was done in the last administration was bad,” she said. “This is the agenda of the president. Scott Pruitt absolutely believes in this agenda, but it comes from the president.”

Pruitt emphasized the improvement of air quality in the United States – ozone levels fell by 17% from 2000 to 2015, while sulfur dioxide dropped by 69% over the same period – which shows that the relentless technological improvements in cars and power plants continue to reduce pollution.

But many former EPA officials have warned against using these improvements as a reason to mitigate protections. The plan to rewrite soon for only one plan was to prevent 3,600 premature deaths and 90,000 asthma attacks nationwide, once in operation.

“This kind of action will slow down the progress we’ve seen,” said Tom Burke, who was EPA’s science advisor in the Obama administration and is now Director of Risk Science at the Johns Hopkins School of Public Health Bloomberg. “Having worked in fence line communities and places with contaminated water, I do not think people are saying” we’re clean enough, let’s get things right. ”

“There is a very obvious change in the EPA to make it more business-friendly. Maybe it’s not a bad thing for the business world, but I’m very concerned that it will affect health Of millions of people.

“The EPA’s mission is to protect public health and the environment, not to protect corporate profits.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *